Stratifying Altmetrics Indicators Based on Impact Generation Model
نویسندگان
چکیده
Introduction Altmetrics has been a shelter for all possible alternative indicators corresponding to traditional citation-based indicators, with extra focus on online indicators. Altmetrics has been discussed in variety of contexts, such as open science (Mounce, 2013), institutional depositories (Adie, Francois, & Nixon, 2014), publishing industry (Piwowar, 2013) and scholarly communication reform (Priem, 2013) etc. Despite the wide recognition and adoption of altmetrics, it has been criticized that stakeholders get confused by so many altmetrics indicators and the exact meaning of each indicator is unclear. We need a methodology with which the existing altmetrics indicators and future potential indicators can be incorporated and interpreted in a manifest and logical way. To reach this goal, this study will: (1) firstly, tap into the meaning of impact by demonstrating the multi-faceted nature of it. (2) secondly, based on multiple empirical researches, introduce an impact generation model that describe how impact becomes perceivable and measurable. (3) thirdly, making use of the impact generation model, explore the different role that each altmetrics indicator plays in the impact generation process. Combined with the level of engagement theory, altmetrics indicators are stratified and logically ordered. (4) fourthly, discuss the merits of the stratification based on impact generation model.
منابع مشابه
مقایسه فرصتهای دگرسنجی و تحلیل استنادی در ارزیابی پژوهش
The present study atempts to explain the strengths of altmetrics and compare them with those of citation-based indicators, and thereby reveal opportunities provided by social web in research evaluation.Applying a qualitative thematic analysis method, it studied the contents of research and theoretical works about the citation and altmetrics indicators in order to extract their authors’ views ab...
متن کاملAltmetrics: New Indicators for Scientific Communication in Web 2.0
This paper presents a review of altmetrics or alternative metrics. This concept is defined as the creation and study of new indicators for analysing scientific and academic research activity based on Web 2.0. The underlying premise is that variables such as mentions in blogs, number of tweets or saves of an article by researchers in reference management systems, may be a valid measure of the us...
متن کاملThe Meaning of Altmetrics
A range of quantitative methods are today widely used in research evaluation (e.g. Moed et al., 1985; Moed et al., 1995). Recently, with the increasing popularity of social media, and especially the increasing use of social media in scholarly activities, a new field of research has been introduced, namely altmetrics, to investigate the use of social media in research evaluation (Priem & Hemming...
متن کاملAltmetrics of "altmetrics" using Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Google-plus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki
We measure the impact of “altmetrics” field by deploying altmetrics indicators using the data from Google Scholar, Twitter, Mendeley, Facebook, Googleplus, CiteULike, Blogs and Wiki during 20102014. To capture the social impact of scientific publications, we propose an index called alt-index, analogues to h-index. Across the deployed indices, our results have shown high correlation among the in...
متن کاملMeasuring field-normalized impact of papers on specific societal groups: An altmetrics study based on Mendeley data
Bibliometrics is successful in measuring impact, because the target is clearly defined: the publishing scientist who is still active and working. Thus, citations are a target-oriented metric which measures impact on science. In contrast, societal impact measurements based on altmetrics are as a rule intended to measure impact in a broad sense on all areas of society (e.g. science, culture, poli...
متن کامل